Hybrid remote and in-clinic maternal-fetal surveillance for women with gestational diabetes: A prospective pilot study

Nuvo

January 24, 2025

2025 IJGO publication explores a hybrid approach to maternal-fetal care for gestational diabetes (GD), integrating virtual visits seamlessly with in-clinic assessments. We assessed the feasibility, time efficiency, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes to facilitate wider adoption of maternal-fetal telemedicine.

This was originally published in the International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics here.

Objective

This study explores a hybrid approach to maternal-fetal care for gestational diabetes (GD), integrating virtual visits seamlessly with in-clinic assessments. We assessed the feasibility, time efficiency, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes to facilitate wider adoption of maternal-fetal telemedicine.

Methods

We conducted a 4-week prospective study involving 20 women with GD at ≥32 weeks of pregnancy, alternating between remote and in-clinic weekly visits. Remote assessments began with women self-measuring vital signs and using a digital urine dipstick. The remote encounter started with a midwife performing anamnesis and remotely connecting women to the fetal nonstress test. A physician concluded the meeting with remote sonographic assessment of amniotic fluid maximal vertical pocket that together with the nonstress test provided the modified biophysical assessment as well as a video encounter and ongoing glycemic control assessment. We assessed the feasibility of remote visits, compared visit durations, evaluated women's satisfaction using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire, examined glucose documentation adherence during hybrid care compared with the following period until birth, and assessed GD-related clinical outcomes.

Results

Remote visits had a success rate of 97.4% (38 of 39), with significantly shorter durations compared with in-clinic visits (median 59.0 min vs. 159.0 min, P < 0.001). Women expressed high satisfaction (6.6 of 7), and adherence with recording fasting glucose values during the study period was significantly higher than the following period until birth (92.2% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.001). Notably, none required induction of labor for glycemic control imbalance, and there were no cases of macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, or neonatal hypoglycemia.

Conclusion

The hybrid approach to maternal-fetal care for GD demonstrated feasibility, safety, time efficiency, improved patient satisfaction, and enhanced glycemic control adherence.